Skipper Clint Gutherson claimed a double as Parramatta defeated Gold Coast 26-20 in the NRL. “Some people will say it doesn’t matter as long as we get the right decision in the end but there has to be some parameters, otherwise we would have stoppages to play all the time. “A team can’t try to create a stoppage in order to challenge something that has previously been missed,” Annesley said. Referee Peter Gough’s decision to allow both challenges did seem to fly in the face of comments made by NRL head of football Graham Annesley at his weekly media briefing last Monday. “Obviously it happened twice and pretty crucial, they scored off the back of both of them.
I was asking because I remember watching the game last week and the ref said to the captain, you can only challenge that last play - the penalty - not the play before which could be a knock-on, might be something else,” Gutherson said. Eels' skipper Clint Gutherson (left) reckons there's confusion over captain's challenges. On both occasions the challenges were upheld and the Titans would go on to score tries in the resulting sets.Įels skipper Gutherson said he was confused by the situation given he was under the impression it wasn’t possible to halt play on purpose to challenge a referee’s call. Gold Coast twice deliberately conceded penalties to halt play and use their captain’s challenge successfully, firstly to reverse a Jarrod Wallace knock-on call and, in the second instance, to pull up an interference against centre Patrick Herbert during a break. The Eels held off a fast-finishing Titans at CBUS Super Stadium to secure a 26-20 win on Saturday but only after the hosts used an apparent loophole in the captain’s challenge system to their advantage. Meanwhile, Parramatta’s Clint Gutherson said he’s unsure when and how a captain’s challenge can be used in the NRL following his side’s win over Gold Coast. Eels skipper seeking clarity on challenges If you aren't offended by non-sexual, mostly distant nudity, you're quite likely to enjoy this film.It remains unclear whether the streaker was injured in the tackle, however she appeared fine as she was walked from the field. Not having streaked since 1974, when it was an American college fad, I was heartened to see in 2017 the (albeit fictional, movie) Swiss/German attitude toward the pranksters: a matter of police interest, yes, but not, apparently, a violation of horrendous moral turpitude. The acting is excellent, and the production values are high, as one might hope when it is produced with the cooperation of a dozen or so European Football Clubs. The cat-and-mouse game that ensues is detailed enough to be interesting, and events are for the most part believable, or at least not wholly absurd. The fans are amused, but management is not, and Detective Sandra Strebel assembles a team to identity the miscreants. To avoid being found out, he and a bookie create a new gambling opportunity, taking bets on how long streakers - whom Naef recruits - can stay on the soccer fields before they are caught by security.
With the purest of intentions, high-school teacher Balz Naef gambles away money that isn't his to lose. It had me cheering for the streaking "gang" and worried that the budding romance would fail. Instead, what I got was a funny caper and heart-warming rom-com.
I expected Streaker to be crap, light enough to pass the time when I was too burned out for anything else, but otherwise worthless.
0 kommentar(er)
